Are traditional language classes the villain in language learning?

“Traditional English classes are bad.”

I recently came across an ad that claimed exactly that.

And I couldn’t disagree more.

Sure, traditional language programs have their limitations. They often focus on narrow goals: passing exams, moving to the next grade, meeting curriculum standards. Many times, they’re taught by early-career teachers juggling limited experience, large classes and overloaded schedules.

But these programs still serve an important role.

They’re where I gained experience, refined my methods, and watched students make real progress—both in English and Spanish. They often use excellent resources: well-designed textbooks, structured curricula, and increasingly, digital tools. For many learners, they’re also the first (and sometimes only) place to access language education.

And the field is always evolving.

Today, learners have more access than ever to coaches who specialize in exactly what they need, from sports communication and business negotiations to medical interviews and creative writing. Because we know that the language skills needed to pass an academic exam are very different from the ones needed to lead a team meeting, sell a campaign, or explain a game plan in a multilingual locker room.

That doesn’t make one approach “bad.”It just means there’s a piece of the pie for all of us.

We don’t need to make traditional language classes the villain. We just need to recognize their limits, appreciate what they do offer, and embrace the new opportunities filling the gaps.

So if traditional English classes are what you have access to—great! In the end, any language learning is a good start.

But if you're looking to grow your skills in a way that truly supports your role, industry, or everyday communication, the good news is: there’s likely a language specialist whose training fits your exact needs.

Maybe even me!